All motion is relative, partly because we know of no ultimate frame of reference--most are theoretical. For instance, if God exists, then his point of view is ultimate. Some believe, however, that he is not bounded by time, which makes it complicated--thus too hypothetical for convenience. For science and most of its measurements, all motion should be considered relative. Additionally, how can there be an absolute space-time when we don't know of one that exists? A person can say the same about God--it's all a matter of personal opinion, not (necessarily, according to your belief) proven fact. Anyway, if we know of no absolute space-time--or cannot possibly reach it or experience it--should we still ponder its hypothetical properties?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.